Air pollution and breast cancer incidence in a United States-wide prospective cohort study: Examining sensitive periods of exposure

Environment International December 2025
  • Date (DD-MM-YYYY)

    15-02-2026 to 15-02-2027

    Available on-demand until 15th February 2027

  • Cost

    Free

  • Education type

    Publication

  • CPD subtype

    On-demand

Background

Mounting evidence supports that air pollution is related to a higher breast cancer risk, yet the importance of exposure timing in this relationship remains unclear.

Methods

In the Sister Study, a United States-wide prospective cohort (n = 50,884, 2003–2009), we estimated time-varying annual concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from 1990 to 2017 at residential addresses using validated spatiotemporal models. Self-reported breast cancer diagnoses were validated using medical records. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer incidence in relation to air pollutant concentrations during predetermined windows of susceptibility. We also applied distributed lag non-linear models to estimate adjusted cumulative and lag-specific HRs and 95 % CIs for the association between air pollutants and breast cancer across a lag period of 0–15 years. We evaluated breast cancer overall and by estrogen receptor (ER) status and tumor extent [ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) versus invasive].

Results

We found limited evidence that air pollutant exposure during the time of a woman’s first birth, most recent birth, or menopause transition was associated with heightened risk for breast cancer. When examining exposure flexibly over the long-term, a 10-ppb increase in NO2 across lag years 1–11 significantly contributed to the risk of ER-positive (HRcumul = 1.14; 95 % CI: 1.03–1.27; n = 2619 cases) and DCIS (HRcumul = 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.04–1.54; n = 706 cases) breast cancer, whereas PM2.5 experienced during lag years 11–13 was associated with ER-negative breast cancer (e.g., HRLag12 = 1.36 per 10-µg/m3 increase, 95 % CI: 1.02–1.81; n = 448 cases).

Conclusions

We identified unique periods of susceptibility to NO2 and PM2.5 for breast cancer risk by ER status.

Contact details

Education Provider

Elsevier

344 active educational opportunities

125 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5AS

[email protected]

Learn more about Pollution, environmental and human health