Plant-based meat alternatives can support reductions in agricultural land expansion and greenhouse gas emissions but entail micronutrient trade-offs

Published: 21 October 2026
  • Date (DD-MM-YYYY)

    24-10-2026 to 24-01-2027

    Available on-demand until 24th January 2027

  • Cost

    Free

  • Education type

    Publication

  • CPD subtype

    On-demand

Plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs), designed to mimic the sensory properties of meat, may help reduce animal-sourced protein consumption and support a shift towards plant-based diets. Here we integrated PBMAs into a land-use model to assess their effects on nutrition, greenhouse gas emissions and food system sustainability. PBMA adoption not only substantially reduced agricultural land expansion and greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture, forestry and other land use sector but also increased risks of micronutrient inadequacy. Across regions, PBMA diets exhibited diminishing marginal returns. Replacing ruminant meat alone achieved nearly half of the potential emission reductions while incurring relatively small nutritional costs. By contrast, broader substitution of livestock products delivered additional environmental benefits but markedly increased micronutrient deficiencies. Targeted policy support, sustainable land management and improved PBMA formulations will be essential to ensure equitable dietary transitions and progress towards global climate and sustainability goals.

Xiong, J., Yu, Z., Gong, Y. et al. Plant-based meat alternatives can support reductions in agricultural land expansion and greenhouse gas emissions but entail micronutrient trade-offs. Nat Food (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01447-5

Contact details

Education Provider

Springer Nature

357 active educational opportunities

Springer Healthcare Ltd, The Campus, 4 Crinan Street, London, N1 9XW

[email protected]

Learn more about Food, nutrition and water