- Share
Environmental and patient safety outcomes of a health-system Green Anesthesia Initiative (GAIA): a retrospective observational cohort study
Clinical impacts and solutions
Published February 2025
Date (DD-MM-YYYY)
21-02-2025 to 21-02-2026
Available on-demand until 21st February 2026
Cost
Free
Education type
Article
CPD subtype
On-demand
Description
Background
Inhaled anaesthetics are greenhouse gases. However, changes in the delivery of inhaled anaesthetics can mitigate environmental impact. We hypothesised that system-wide changes to the delivery of anaesthesia care would reduce environmental harm without compromising patient outcomes.
Methods
We launched the Green Anesthesia Initiative (GAIA) in March, 2022, with the aims of reducing the use of nitrous oxide, using less environmentally harmful inhaled fluorinated ethers, and increasing intravenous anaesthetic use. In this retrospective cohort study, we used electronic health record data from general anaesthetics performed on all patients older than 1 year between March 1, 2021, and Feb 28, 2023, at a single US academic medical centre across multiple sites, collecting data from before and after the introduction of GAIA. Patients with missing or invalid data recorded by the anaesthesia machine, patients given general anaesthetics for electroconvulsive therapy, and patients who met American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification 6 were excluded. Using multivariable modelling, we compared estimated CO2, equivalents and, secondarily, anaesthetic dose, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain scores on a 0–10 scale, and reports of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall.
Findings
We recorded 45 692 patients pre-intervention (23 193 [50·8%] female, 22 494 [49·2%] male, five [<0·1%] unknown) and 47 199 post-intervention (23 981 [50·8%] female, 23 209 [49·2%] male, nine [<0·1%] unknown). After the implementation of GAIA, CO2, equivalents were reduced by 14·38 kg per patient (95% CI –14·68 to –14·07; p<0·0001). There was no clinically meaningful difference in median anaesthetic delivered (minimum alveolar concentration –0·02 [95% CI –0·02 to –0·01]; p<0·0001) nor pain scores (–0·34 [–0·39 to –0·29]; p<0·0001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting was unchanged (odds ratio 0·98 [95% CI 0·94–1·02]; p=0·26). A small number of definite intraoperative awareness events were reported in both periods (one pre-intervention and two post-intervention).
Interpretation
A health-system wide intervention reduces greenhouse gas emissions attributable to anaesthesia care without detriment to patient outcomes.
Contact details
Email address
Telephone number
0207 424 4950

Elsevier Ltd
125 London Wall
London
EC2Y 5AS